I'm sometimes accused, in one forum or
another, of naive optimism.
How can I hold out the prospect of a
world guided radically by the compassion of Jesus, and of an earth and
time to come filled with peace and forgiveness? The overwhelming
evidence is to the contrary.
Especially as a Girardian, surely I
should accept the final word is "Battling To The End," not
the end of battling.
Allow me, therefore, to bring a word in defense of my Pollyannaish viewpoint. The recent Theology and
Peace conference underlined the need. You can't continue to do public
theology without hope at its core. If we continue to expand the T&P
community, reaching out to new constituencies and demographics, the
more it will be the message of hope that keeps people coming back.
Apart from René Girard there has been
one other major living influence in my life. It was Carlo Carretto of
the Little Brothers of the Gospel, with whom I spent a deeply
formative year in community. He used to say, with his usual
passionate panache, "Optimism is not the same as hope. The former is
a human condition of mind, the other is a gift from God."
Emily Dickinson famously said "Hope
is the thing with feathers." I am tempted to think she got the
word "thing" from the version of Corinthians: "Three
things remain, faith, hope and love..."
In Hebrews faith is described as the
underlying reality or substance of things hoped for (11:1).
In other words faith reaches out in
relationship to something real that is absent to sight, while hope
acts on that reality in the present, effectively bringing it into the
present.
Hope is a relationship to the unseen in
the here and now. Traditionally it is called a virtue, which means
something like a personal strength. Certainly it gives strength, but
it is much more a relationship. Even less is it an intellectual
vision, something seen by the mind. Our standard Christian
epistemologies (rooted in the individual, intellectual soul) have
skewed the sense of a living relationship experienced in the body.
Hope is feminine whole-body
relationship, a being in-touch with the future thing of Christ. That
is why it was women who first "got" the resurrection, and
they did so by touching the Risen One.
A hope-filled person changes the world
constructed around her because she feels and knows it as already changed.
The
cosmos is changed because of the resurrection. Perhaps the standard pop male
version of resurrection relationship is science fiction. Science fiction
channels the resurrection but at the same time gives lots of toys for
the boys. Essentially sci-fi is brought to birth by the story of
resurrection, given its plotline to explore
strange new worlds, to seek out new life and
new civilizations. Perhaps one reason why resurrection hope is
displaced in sci-fi is that the church has been so bad at proclaiming
the concrete reality of resurrection.
The resurrection is a concrete reality
discovered not by a spacecraft, but by a whole-body relationship with
the Risen One. It is cosmic metamorphosis right in our backyard,
right in our kitchen, because the New Testament narrative makes it
clear that the conditions of physical life have not been abolished
but transformed in Christ.
So here then is the thing (really).
Because of this astonishing cosmological shift the actual
conditions of the world are already changed into peace and
forgiveness. Hope is the link to this change and it is experienced as
a "thing," as real and substantive, because that is the way
we experience our bodily reality. It is not a ghostly world or
intellectual idea because these are constructs and displacements made
out of death and rejection of the body, while hope is an actual thing that
remains.
Which means that no matter how hard the
violence of the world presses, no matter how the armies and weapons
accumulate, no matter how our system of crisis doubles down on
itself, and even if the very bombs themselves are dropped, the
concrete physical reality of the Risen One remains. In him the new
earth already exists. In him, as he said, paradise is today.
But if we also add in the underlying
leavening effect of the gospel in the contemporary world--which I
have constantly argued, in Virtually Christian and elsewhere--it means the rest of the world is
also picking up this concrete hope. Despite the world, against the
grain, in a masked and often contorted form, all the same, this hope is
showing itself in the concrete, practical affairs of humanity, in the
political, the social, the legal, the medical, and the media. And of
course in popular entertainment and culture.
So none of us should be scared off by
the threat of doom. Or, place our faith in some beam-me-up-Jesus of a
"spiritual" other world, or indeed in a me-alone-with-my-loved-ones brute survival possibility. The victory is already won in the
here and now, in all its immense and mysterious human complexity.
We do not know of course how exactly it will work
out, and against what catastrophes and reversals it still has to
contend. But the feathered thing from God says it will work out. "Do
not fear, I have overcome the world."
The Christian call then is to affirm this
concrete hope in all things, not mimetically to doubt it. The so-called "realists" really are not real enough.
Tony Bartlett, Contributing Theologian
No comments:
Post a Comment